session 12 part 1

I’m working on a Academic question and need guidance to help me study.

For 12 weeks, or so, we’ve been reading and interpreting a lot of research. Last week, we started to shift toward the interesting idea of making research – and, not just that, but the kind of research that might really matter for practice, and contribute to our working knowledge as teachers.

This week, I want to introduce a framework for thinking about how we meld these ideas about systematic inquiry and research, and reflective, evidence-driven practice. That framework is improvement science.

We’ll talk more about the actual framework later – first, though, I want you to talk a bit about the Bryk (2015) article. After you read it, answer the following questions in your first discussion post:

First – what is Tony’s core argument? What is he saying in this keynote?

Second – does Tony’s argument make sense to you? Why, or why not?

Finally – do you think Tony’s proposal is a workable model for public education (or, if you’re not in public ed – your own work)?


Answering this question is not essay as it seems. It will require you to research or burn your brain power, write your findings down, edit, proofread severally, and submit unsure of the grade you will get. assignment writers are offering to take care of that. Order your assignment now, relax, submit, and enjoy excellent grades. We guarantee you 100% original answers, timely delivery, and some free products.